Chesapeake Energy Drills Deeper for Profit
U.S. natural-gas giant pins rebound on fracking ‘supersize’ wells that run for miles underground
CADDO PARISH, La.—Doug Lawler watched a drilling rig’s high-pressure pumps rumble as workers bored in to a massive natural-gas well, part of a new drilling campaign the Chesapeake Energy Corp. chief executive calls “Prop-a-geddon.”
Named for the sand that drillers use to prop open hydraulically fractured rocks, Prop-a-geddon is an experiment to create supersize oil and gas wells that the company estimates can extract fossil fuels for roughly 75% less than typical wells, thanks to potentially greater economies of scale.
This well, in the Haynesville Shale formation around Shreveport, La., went 2 miles deep and another 2 miles horizontally, and used 51 million pounds of sand, which the company believes is a world record. Typical wells in this area extend about 5,000 feet, or less than a mile.
“It’s the biggest job in the history of the Haynesville,” Mr. Lawler said of the massive size of the fracking job under way. “It’s absolutely critical to the company.”
In a world where oil prices look poised to stay lower for longer, even after the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries agreed to a production cut last week, the challenge for U.S. shale drillers is no longer unlocking new supplies—it is showing they can make money doing it.
For Chesapeake, a deeply indebted pioneer of the U.S. shale boom co-founded by the late wildcatter Aubrey McClendon, its very survival may depend on figuring it out.
Under Mr. McClendon, Chesapeake became the second-largest U.S. natural-gas producer after Exxon Mobil Corp., leading a rush to lease land for drilling from Pennsylvania to Texas. But in doing so, it piled up a mountain of debt and a litany of lawsuits that left it reeling—and led to the ouster of Mr. McClendon—even before energy prices collapsed in 2014.
Mr. Lawler, brought in by activist investors, is selling assets to pare debt, and trying to transition the money-losing company into a prudent spender that can produce oil and gas more economically, and eventually turn a profit.
He estimates the Oklahoma City-based company’s true debt was roughly $21 billion when he took over in 2013. Between 2010 and 2012, the company had spent nearly $30 billion more on drilling and leasing than it had brought in from operations.
This year, Chesapeake expects to spend no more than $1.75 billion to produce between 617,000 and 637,000 barrels of oil equivalent a day. That is nearly 90% less than the $14.7 billion Chesapeake spent in 2012 to produce 648,000 barrels of oil equivalent a day. Debt, meanwhile, has been cut to $10.9 billion.
Chesapeake has reduced its workforce by roughly 70% to about 3,500 employees and shrunk its drillable land portfolio to about 7 million acres, compared with 15 million at the end of 2012.
